data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cd11/5cd1180264c0eca0804f50b77f2124805c731ba0" alt="Perpetual motion machine"
Although the energy lost due to air friction is very small, remember, we are talking about perpetual motion machines here, if there is a loss mechanism, eventually, the machine will still lose its energy and run down (even if it takes a long, long time). Operating the machine anywhere will cause the machine to lose energy due to the friction between the moving parts and air. The machine must be operated inside a vacuum (no air): The reason for this has to do with the reason listed in number one. This friction will ultimately cause the machine to lose its energy to heat. This is because of friction that would be created between the two. The machine should not have any “rubbing” parts: Any moving part must not touch other parts. Such a machine should satisfy the following 3 properties, at the least.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f3fe/7f3fe89e8f4182da69686d89a1c7261ca26202c1" alt="perpetual motion machine perpetual motion machine"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7da25/7da25b9d7264cc5a9ab94f54672f783183c77449" alt="perpetual motion machine perpetual motion machine"
A perpetual motion machine of the third kind is usually (but not always) defined as one that completely eliminates friction and other dissipative forces, to maintain motion forever (due to its mass inertia).This conversion of heat into useful work, without any side effect, is impossible, according to the second law of thermodynamics. The signature of a perpetual motion machine of the second kind is that there is only one heat reservoir involved, which is being spontaneously cooled without involving a transfer of heat to a cooler reservoir. However, it does violate the more subtle second law of thermodynamics (see also entropy). When the thermal energy is equivalent to the work done, this does not violate the law of conservation of energy. A perpetual motion machine of the second kind is a machine which spontaneously converts thermal energy into mechanical work.It thus violates the first law of thermodynamics: the law of conservation of energy. A perpetual motion machine of the first kind produces work without the input of energy.Various kinds of Perpetual Motion Machines can be classified in following categories and here we see, why they are doomed to fail given our current understanding of Science. That heat is energy escaping, and it would keep leeching out, reducing the energy available to move the system itself until the machine inevitably stopped. Any real machine would have moving parts or interactions with air or liquid molecules that would generate tiny amounts of friction and heat, even in a vacuum. The second law of thermodynamics tells us that energy tends to spread out through processes like friction.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b540f/b540f64fe7d5e4c2ddf381e315cb8fa90f3cdb90" alt="perpetual motion machine perpetual motion machine"
None of them work.Įven if engineers could somehow design a machine that didn’t violate the first law of thermodynamics, it still wouldn’t work in the real world because of the second law of thermodynamics. There wouldn’t be any leftover to power a car or charge a phone.īut what if you just wanted the machine to keep itself moving? Inventors have proposed plenty of ideas. That rules out a useful perpetual motion machine right away because a machine could only ever produce as much energy as it consumed. You can’t get out more energy than you put in. The first law of thermodynamics says that energy can’t be created or destroyed. Ideas for perpetual motion machines all violate one or more fundamental laws of thermodynamics, the branch of physics that describes the relationship between different forms of energy. For example, if you could build a perpetual motion machine that included humans as part of its perfectly efficient system, it could sustain life indefinitely. These devices have captured many inventors’ imaginations because they could transform our relationship with energy. Or a lightbulb whose glow provided its own electricity. Imagine a windmill that produced the breeze it needed to keep rotating. Bhaskara’s drawing was one of the earliest designs for a perpetual motion machine, a device that can do work indefinitely without any external energy source. The imbalance would keep the wheel turning forever. He reasoned that as the wheels spun, the mercury would flow to the bottom of each reservoir, leaving one side of the wheel perpetually heavier than the other. Around 1159 A.D., a mathematician called Bhaskara the Learned sketched a design for a wheel containing curved reservoirs of mercury.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cd11/5cd1180264c0eca0804f50b77f2124805c731ba0" alt="Perpetual motion machine"